find a solicitor from the best UK solicitors directory
Facebook law Twitter law

Sponsored links

Solicitor.info Blog

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Beware standing a Lawyer up….

Tuesday, February 7th, 2012

In the spring of 1978 a Mr Tom Horsley, a 30 year old lawyer from San Jose invited Miss Alyn Chesseltet out for an evening. At the very last minute she cancelled.
Mr Horsley then sued her.

He went to the small claims court and filed a lawsuit against Miss Chesselet on the grounds that she had broken an oral contract to have dinner and see the musical the Wizz. Mr Horsley, who made a 100 mile round trip to visit her, informed the court that he wanted to be paid for two hours of driving at his minimum rate and car expenses per mile + a filing fee + a fee to serve court papers.

Do you know some one who would do this if they thought they could get away with it?


Interesting mapping website

Wednesday, February 1st, 2012

Check out this really interesting website on car ownership uk

What is it to be Brittish…….?

Tuesday, January 24th, 2012

Being British is about driving in a German car to an Irish pub for a
Belgian beer, then travelling home, grabbing an Indian curry or a Turkish
kebab on the way, to sit on Swedish furniture and watch American shows on a
Japanese TV. And the most British thing of all?
Suspicion of anything foreign.

Settlements Announced in Phone Hacking Case

Friday, January 20th, 2012

The settlement figures are beginning to roll in – at least, those wishing to divulge what they received from News International. Eighteen victims agreed to put their settlement figures into the official court dockets while another nineteen opted to keep it private. Here’s what we know –

The total paid to these 18 named victims comes to more than £600,000. Allegations were that senior employees and directors at News Group Newspapers (the News International subsidiary that published the News of the World) were aware that their journalists illegally taking part in certain practices and that these individuals were looking to deliberately deceive investigators and destroyed evidence.

It’s important to note that NGN has not admitted or denied any of these claims, even though it agreed compensation could be assessed on that basis. They’ve not commented publicly since the rulings on Thursday.

(These settlements do not include the court costs, which were awarded to each of the recipients.)
Actor Jude Law – £130,000
Journalist Tom Rowland – £25,000
MP Chris Bryant – £30,000
Designer Sadie Frost – £50,000
Rugby Player Gavin Henson – £40,000
MP Denis MacShane – £32,500
Assistant to Jude Law, Ben Jackson – £40,000
Sports Solicitor Graham Shear – £25,000
Denis MacShane former partner Joan Smith – £27,500
Ciara Parkes (PR to Jude Law) – £35,000
Guy Pelly (nightclub entrepreneur and friend of Prince Harry) – £40,000
Former Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott – £40,000

It’s not over yet, though. Neville Thurlbeck, a former editor and reporter for News International posted on his controversial blog after court:

Much more evidence against News International will come in the future.

I worked there from 1988 onwards and I am aware of executives who witnessed practices which would send the share price crashing through the floor.

I expect much of this to come out in industrial tribunals and High Court actions by former members of staff.

But it is the irrevocable loss of trust which could sink it.

Even with the monetary payouts, it’s clear this chapter’s not ended.

Manning Judge Refuses to Step Down

Friday, December 16th, 2011

Just as the case against Bradley Manning finally appeared to be kicking off, court was quickly adjourned on Friday.

Manning, a 23 year old U.S. soldier has been charged with unleashing countless American government documents to WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange.

Here in the U.S., all eyes were on Lt. Col. Paul Almanza as defense attorney, David Coombs ask him to recuse himself because of the potential bias in the case. Lt. Col. Almanza refused to do so, saying there was no reason to believe bias would enter into his decision making process. At that time, Coombs requested a recess so that he could re-strategize.

Coombs claims Almanza’s role as a former Justice Department prosecutor would prevent him from maintaining fairness in Manning’s case. The Justice Department has sought to shut down WikiLeaks from the very beginning. Further, Coombs cried foul when 36 of 38 of his witnesses would not be testifying. And, finally, along with those too concerns, Coombs said the media’s presence would put his client at a disadvantage. American courts often allow media to attend and even broadcast trials as they are happening.

As things began heating up, Almanza loudly exclaimed that his time with the prosecution was served on child exploitation and obscenity cases, which had no correlation on any level with Manning’s case. Nevertheless, Coombs is in the process of filing a series of writs with the Army Corp Criminal Appeals in an effort to further delay the trial and get Almanza kicked off the trial.

Manning facings more than 20 charges of leaking the confidential information – even information that could have put military forces in jeopardy – and faces life in prison if he’s convicted.

In the states, the court of public opinion has long since determined Manning is a traitor and deserves the harshest punishment possible. This, as Assange continues to rest comfortably as news arrives that he won’t have to go to Sweden until after the new year if his appeals against extradition are successful.

Meanwhile in Liverpool….

Thursday, December 8th, 2011

Addsence adds placment (when it goes wrong)

Sunday, September 18th, 2011

New Legal Woes for News of the World?

Friday, September 16th, 2011

Looks as though the now-defunct News of the World might be in hot water once again, courtesy of a large collection of what’s being called “previously undiscovered documents and emails”. It’s believed if verified, this new cache would bring the scandal to an entirely new level. Worse, those in the know say these documents are in the “tens of thousands”.

The judge, Mr. Justice Vos, said this revelation is “significant”, and included nearly seventy pages of names associated with Glenn Mulcaire, who you’ll recall is the jailed phone hacker. These documents memorialize the requests for “voice mail interception”. Mulcaire typically documented the requests he received with handwritten notes, including either the names or initials of the journalists making the requests. One victim was allegedly told by Mulcaire that he couldn’t remember who requested the inquiry regarding the victim’s privacy violation. Before long, Mulcaire and his team of solicitors found themselves in a courtroom, only to learn Mulcaire would be forced to answer tough questions.

Needless to say, there are probably many on the phone today with their own solicitors in an effort to stave off any new disclosures. Solicitors have also been in court concerning the new information. Mr. Justice Vos said, in his own statement, “There’s some important material in what’s already been disclosed…there’s some significant material and I’m sure there’s lots more to come”.

Damages are set to be announced in January 2011 as all the legal teams gather together once again in front of Mr. Justice Vos. Among other things, efforts to define monetary damages in various areas of the case will be determined in hopes of eliminating time consuming court cases while also keeping the “little fish” from being pulled into it the scandal.

Have you liked our Facebook page yet? You can also follow Solicitor Info on Twitter @SolicitorInfo. We’re doing great things with our solicitor reviews – come and see for yourself!

Lawsuits Galore

Saturday, September 3rd, 2011

As if things couldn’t get any worse for the housing crisis in the United States, news came Friday that the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which oversees Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, is suing 17 banks. The lawsuits are based on accusations that the banks, including Goldman Sachs, Citi and JP Morgan, violated federal securities laws when it made private label mortgage backed securities for homes across the country. The total lawsuit adds up to nearly $200 billion U.S. dollars. Bank of America could find themselves facing a $10 billion hit.

Many Americans have grown weary of the financial outlook and the U.S. government’s lack of focus on other more pressing matters, while others have criticized the Obama Administration’s lack of attention paid to the banks. The collective bank body has benefited from a $700 billion bailout effort that came after Lehman Brothers set the wheels in motion in 2008.

As word came down late in the day on Friday, there were immediate repercussions, including a near-250 point drop. Bank of America’s shares fell more than 8% and other banks had similar losses.

Further complicating matters is the belief by many analysts that it will take years to resolve these lawsuits – and a lot of taxpayer money. As Jaret Seiberg, a policy analyst with MF Global stated, “There’s no much incentive for either side to settle”.

The government’s not the only body suing the banks, though. Private investors have also kept their legal teams busy with their own lawsuits. Regardless of the outcome, the fact is no one wins and certainly, the American taxpayer is the one that has even more to lose. Even as the lawsuits were announced, many banks were already prepared with their own statements that criticized the government and said it should have know the securities had no shortage of risks and that the “sophisticated investors” should know the losses are due to the devastating housing crash and not due to any illegal activities.

Have you checked out our solicitor rating service? Find a great solicitor in the UK or leave your comments and experiences for those seeking representation. Be sure to follow us on Twitter and Facebook, too.

“Serious Investigations” Into Drug Mix Up

Thursday, August 25th, 2011

An over the counter painkiller, Nurofen Plus, is being pulled from store shelves throughout the UK today after a safety alert was issued saying it contain a prescription anti-psychotic drug.

Consumers are being warned that thousands of packages of Nurofen Plus could be tainted and they’re being warned to use extreme caution when using it until the altered packages can be located and destroyed. The prescription drug, Seroquel XL is believed to be included in those packets in “strips”. So far, it’s been found in three packets. Those three packets were found in Victoria, Beckenham and Bromley. No word yet on how far the packets might have traveled.

Solicitors in the UK as well as the Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency are monitoring the situation, as the potential damage could be devastating.

Seroquel XL is manufactured by Astra Zenaca and is obtained only through a prescription. It’s an anti-psychotic drug that’s commonly used to treat mental disorders such as depression, schizophrenia and other mania-related illnesses. Side effects include drowsiness, headaches and dizziness and consumers are warned to not operate heavy machinery.

If you’ve purchased Nurofen Plus and are concerned, you’re encouraged to return the package to the pharmacy you purchased it from. In the meantime, consumers are encouraged to closely examine their medication as the two differ. Seroquel XL have black packaging with gold trim while Nurofen Plus are tablets and smaller in size. They too have silver and black packaging.

As mentioned, all three discoveries were located in London and officials have launched a “serious investigation” to determine how it occurred and how wide the problem might be. Any concerns, at this point, should be directed to consumers’ physicians.

AstraZenca, through its legal team, released a statement on Thursday that reads, in part:

“Patient safety is the primary concern of AstraZeneca and the company is taking this issue seriously. AstraZeneca is collaborating with the MHRA and Reckitt Benckiser to investigate the root cause… “

Sponsored links