Baker Macdonald, Sevenoaks Reviews & Information

Home > UK Solicitor > Sevenoaks > Baker Macdonald

Add review

Not yet rated

0 review(s) removed
Why are reviews removed?


How to find us

The Old Bat & Ball, St Johns Hill, Sevenoaks, Kent, TN13 3PF

Mobile phone icon01732 228833Email iconEmail
Laptop iconWebsite

Languages spoken English 
Size of firm 3 solicitors


Are you this solicitor?    
Contact us to take control of your listing or to request any edits to your information

All content on solicitor.info is viewed and used at your own risk and we do not warrant the accuracy or reliability of any of the information.


Reviews

Add review

Summary

5 stars   0
4 stars   0
3 stars   0
2 stars   0
1 stars   0

Legal services at this branch

  • Commercial litigation
  • Commercial property
  • Consumer
  • Conveyancing - residential
  • Employment
  • Family - general
  • Litigation - general
  • Private client - Probate
  • Private client - Wills


Add review

Filter Reviews

 


Compiled from data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority website

10/01/18

Source: https://www.sra.org.uk/consumers/solicitor-check/157679.article?Decision=2018-01-10

Outcome: Condition
Outcome details

This outcome was reached by SRA decision.

Decision details



Mr Michael Baker is subject to Regulation 3 of the SRA Practising Regulations 2011.

His practising certificate for 2017/2018 is subject to the following conditions which are necessary, reasonable and proportionate in the public interest:



Mr Baker may act as a solicitor, only as an employee whose role has first been approved by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

Mr Baker may not act as a manager or owner of any authorised body.

Mr Baker does not hold, receive or have access to client money, or act as a signatory to any client or office account, or have the power to authorise electronic transfers from any client or office account.

Mr Baker may not act as a compliance officer for legal practice (COLP) or compliance officer for finance and administration (COFA) for any authorised body or authorised non SRA firm.

Mr Baker shall immediately inform any actual or prospective employer of these conditions and the reasons for their imposition.



In these conditions the definitions are as defined in the SRA Handbook Glossary 2012.



Reasons/basisThe above conditions are considered to be necessary in the public interest and reasonable and proportionate having regard to the purposes set out in Regulation 7 of the SRA Practising Regulations 2011 and the regulatory objectives and principles governing regulatory activities as contained in section 28 of the Legal Services Act 2007.

Was this review helpful?  
Thumbs up 0   Thumbs down 0

Respond   Report abuse

Compiled from data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority website

31/01/17

Source: https://www.sra.org.uk/consumers/solicitor-check/157679.article?Decision=2018-01-10

Outcome: Condition
Outcome details

This outcome was reached by SRA decision.

Decision details



Mr Michael Baker is subject to Regulation 3 of the SRA Practising Regulations 2011.

His practising certificate for 2016/2017 is subject to the following conditions which are necessary, reasonable and proportionate in the public interest:



Mr Baker may act as a solicitor, only as an employee whose role has first been approved by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

Mr Baker may not act as a manager or owner of any authorised body.

Mr Baker does not hold, receive or have access to client money, or act as a signatory to any client or office account, or have the power to authorise electronic transfers from any client or office account.

Mr Baker may not act as a compliance officer for legal practice (COLP) or compliance officer for finance and administration (COFA) for any authorised body or authorised non SRA firm.

Mr Baker shall immediately inform any actual or prospective employer of these conditions and the reasons for their imposition.



In these conditions the definitions are as defined in the SRA Handbook Glossary 2012.



Reasons/basisThe above conditions are considered to be necessary in the public interest and reasonable and proportionate having regard to the purposes set out in Regulation 7 of the SRA Practising Regulations 2011 and the regulatory objectives and principles governing regulatory activities as contained in section 28 of the Legal Services Act 2007.

Was this review helpful?  
Thumbs up 0   Thumbs down 0

Respond   Report abuse

Subscribe to updates

Complete the form below to be notified of new reviews or responses added for this solicitor.


terms of use

Enter this code » Verify

Related links

About us
Legal info
For Solicitors
FAQ
20223 solicitor reviews

3,276,208 page views