1 reviews (1/5) and information for Rose Akutu, Stockwell

Home > UK Solicitor > Stockwell > Rose Akutu

Add review

1.0 stars average for Rose Akutu from 1 reviews  
1 Review(s)

0 review(s) removed
Why are reviews removed?


How to find us

135-143 Stockwell Road, Stockwell, Greater London, SW9



Are you this solicitor?    
Contact us to take control of your listing or to request any edits to your information

All content on solicitor.info is viewed and used at your own risk and we do not warrant the accuracy or reliability of any of the information.


Reviews

1.0 stars average for Rose Akutu from 1 reviews

Based on 1 review(s)

Add review

Summary

5 stars   0
4 stars   0
3 stars   0
2 stars   0
1 stars   1

Legal services at this branch



      Add review

      Filter Reviews

       


      Rose Akutu

      General Legal advice

      1 stars

      06/02/12 - Reviewed by Solicitors Regulation Authority

      Decision - prosecution

      Outcome: Referral to Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal

      Outcome date: 21 June 2011

      Published date: 1 February 2012
      Firm details
      Firm or organisation at date of publication and at time of matters giving rise to outcome

      Name: Ross Simon & Co Solicitors

      Address(es):
      135-143 Stockwell Road, London SW9

      Firm ID: 515406
      Outcome details

      This outcome was reached by SRA decision.
      Reasons/basis

      This notification relates to a Decision to prosecute before the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal. This is an independent Tribunal which will reach its own decision after considering all the evidence, including any evidence put forward by the Solicitor. The Tribunal has certified that there is a case to answer in respect of allegations which are or include that she :-

      Acted in breach of the Solicitors Code of Conduct 2007 in that she :

      1. Created or permitted to be created Conditional Fee Agreements which were false;

      2. Falsely represented and/or permitted to be represented that she had signed documents when a third party had signed them in her name;

      3. Held out and/or permitted a third party to hold himself out as a solicitor or an employee of her firm when that third party was neither of those things;

      4. Made statements on her application for Professional Indemnity Insurance which were inaccurate.

      The allegations are subject to a Hearing before the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal and are as yet unproven.

      More info here: http://www.sra.org.uk/consumers/solicitor-check/000822.article?Decision-2

      Was this review helpful?  
      Thumbs up 45   Thumbs down 52

      Respond   Report abuse

      Subscribe to updates

      Complete the form below to be notified of new reviews or responses added for this solicitor.


      terms of use

      Enter this code » Verify

      Related links

      About us
      Legal info
      For Solicitors
      FAQ
      70989 solicitor reviews

      5,778,306 page views