Abiodun Oludare Odunlami Reviews & Information

Add review

1 stars  
1 Review(s)

0 review(s) removed
Why are reviews removed?


232 Royal College Street, Camden Town, London, NW1 9NJ

Reviews

1 stars

Based on 1 review(s)

Add review

Summary

5 stars   0
4 stars   0
3 stars   0
2 stars   0
1 stars   1

Legal services at this branch

      Are you this solicitor?    
      Contact us to take control of your listing or to request any edits to your information

      All content on solicitor.info is viewed and used at your own risk and we do not warrant the accuracy or reliability of any of the information.

      Filter Reviews

       


      Abiodun Oludare Odunlami

      General Legal advice

      1 stars

      15/12/11 - Reviewed by Solicitors Regulation Authority

      Decision - control of practice

      Outcome: Condition

      Outcome date: 17 May 2011

      Published date: 30 June 2011
      Firm details

      No detail provided
      Outcome details

      This outcome was reached by SRA decision.
      Decision details

      An Adjudicator DECIDED to GRANT Mr Abiodun Oludare Odunlami a practising certificate for the practice year 2010/2011 pursuant to Section 16(4) of the Solicitors Act 1974 (as amended by the Legal Services Act 2007 (in force 31 March 2009)) and Regulation 3.2(b)(iii) of the SRA Practising Regulations 2009 subject to the following conditions:-

      1. He may act as a solicitor only in employment, the arrangements for which have first been approved by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.
      2. He is not a sole practitioner or a manager or owner of a recognised body.
      3. That Mr Odunlami fully informs any actual or prospective employer of these conditions and the reasons for their imposition.

      Reasons/basis

      Mr Odunlami is subject to Regulation 3.1 (a)(i), (b), (c), (e), (f) and (n) of the SRA Practising Regulations 2009.

      In reaching this decision, the Adjudicator considered the SRA Practising Regulations 2009, and in particular, Regulation 6, which sets out the purposes for which conditions, may be imposed on a practising certificate, in order to protect the interests of the public.

      ______________________________
      Decision - prosecution

      Outcome: Referral to Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal

      Outcome date: 29 December 2010

      Published date: 12 December 2011
      Firm details
      Firm or organisation at date of publication

      Name: N/A

      Address(es):

      Firm ID:
      Firm or organisation at time of matters giving rise to outcome

      Name: Maxwell Jones Solicitors & Anthony Taylors Solicitors

      Address(es):
      1a Harmood Street, Camden, London NW1 9NJ & 232 Royal College Street, London NW1 9NJ

      Firm ID: 384086 & 470077
      Outcome details

      This outcome was reached by SRA decision.
      Reasons/basis

      This notification relates to a Decision to prosecute before the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal. This is an independent Tribunal which will reach its own decision after considering all the evidence, including any evidence put forward by the Solicitor. The Tribunal has certified that there is a case to answer in respect of allegations which are or include :-

      • He failed to deliver an Accountant’s Report for the period ending 31 May 2009 promptly or at all.

      • He failed to comply with an Order of an SRA Adjudicator and in so doing acted in a manner likely to diminish the public confidence in the profession.

      • He failed to act with the SRA in an open, prompt and cooperative manner.

      The allegations are subject to a Hearing before the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal and are as yet unproven.
      _________________________
      Decision - closure

      Outcome: Closure

      Outcome date: 28 May 2009

      Published date: 3 June 2009
      Firm details
      Firm or organisation at time of matters giving rise to outcome

      Name: Anthony Taylors Solicitors

      Address(es):
      232 Royal College Street, London, NW1 9NJ

      Firm ID: 470077
      Outcome details

      This outcome was reached by SRA decision.
      Reasons/basis

      1. The Panel was satisfied that grounds for intervention existed under Paragraph 1(1)(a) of Part I of Schedule 1 Solicitors Act 1974 (as amended). The Panel was satisfied that there was reason to suspect dishonesty on the part of Abiodun Oludare Odunlami.

      2. The Panel was satisfied that grounds for intervention existed under Paragraph 1(1)(k) of Part I of Schedule 1 Solicitors Act 1974 (as amended) namely that Abiodun Oludare Odunlami has acted as a solicitor at a time when he did not have a practising certificate which was in force.

      3. The Panel was also satisfied that grounds for intervention existed under Paragraph 1(1)(l) of Part I of Schedule 1 Solicitors Act 1974 (as amended) namely that Abiodun Oludare Odunlami failed to comply with a condition imposed on his practising certificate for 2007/2008 that he may act as a solicitor only in approved employment or approved partnership. Mr Odunlami has continued to practise as sole principal of Anthony Taylors Solicitor since the condition came into effect on 9 December 2008.

      4. The Panel was also satisfied that grounds for intervention existed under Paragraph 1(1)(m) of Part I of Schedule 1 of the Solicitors Act 1974 (as amended), namely, that the Panel was satisfied that it was necessary to exercise the powers conferred by Part II of this Schedule (or any of them) in relation to Abiodun Oludare Odunlami to protect the interests of clients (or former or potential clients) of Mr Odunlami or his firm, or the interests of the beneficiaries of any trust which Mr Odunlami is or was a trustee.

      More information here:

      Was this review helpful?  
      Thumbs up 0   Thumbs down 0

      Respond   Report abuse

      Subscribe to updates

      Complete the form below to be notified of new reviews or responses added for this solicitor.


      terms of use

      Enter this code » Verify

      Related links

      Ask a solicitor a question
      Advice
      FAQ
      For Solicitors
      16214 solicitor reviews

      3,050,634 page views