11 reviews (1/5) and information for Alsters Kelley LLP, Leamington Spa

Home > UK Solicitor > Leamington Spa > Alsters Kelley LLP

Add review

1.5 stars average for Alsters Kelley LLP from 11 reviews  
11 Review(s)

0 review(s) removed
Why are reviews removed?


How to find us

Hamilton House, Hamilton Terrace, Leamington Spa, Warwickshire, CV32 4LY

Other branches


Languages spoken English 
Size of firm 11 solicitors


Are you this solicitor?    
Contact us to take control of your listing or to request any edits to your information

All content on solicitor.info is viewed and used at your own risk and we do not warrant the accuracy or reliability of any of the information.


Reviews

1.5 stars average for Alsters Kelley LLP from 11 reviews

Based on 11 review(s)

Add review

Summary

5 stars   0
4 stars   1
3 stars   0
2 stars   0
1 stars   6

Legal services at this branch

  • Administrative and public law
  • Advocacy
  • Benefits and allowances
  • Children
  • Clinical negligence
  • Commercial litigation
  • Commercial property
  • Company and commercial
  • Consumer
  • Conveyancing - residential
  • Crime - general
  • Defamation
  • Employment
  • Family - general
  • Family - mediation
  • Human rights
  • Immigration - nationality and citizenship
  • Landlord and tenant - residential
  • Litigation - general
  • Mental health
  • Neighbour disputes
  • Personal injury
  • Planning
  • Private client - Probate
  • Private client - trusts
  • Private client - Wills
  • Professional negligence
  • Tax


Add review

Filter Reviews

 


Alsters Kelley LLP

Conveyancing/property

1 stars

25/06/19 - Reviewed by Anonymous

I wouldn't even give 1 star. They are dreadful, as previously mentioned they don't return calls/emails , don't acknowledge emails. No communication. No idea whats going on with your case. Paperwork takes weeks to be sent out. Never would I use them again. 10 Phone calls in 2 weeks to get paperwork sent out.

Was this review helpful?  
Thumbs up 0   Thumbs down 0

Respond   Report abuse

Alsters Kelley LLP

Conveyancing/property

1 stars

12/06/19 - Reviewed by Anonymous

Given one star, as it wasn't possible to give zero. Awful. No response. No respect. If you value your sale/purchase and your sanity, avoid at all costs.

Was this review helpful?  
Thumbs up 1   Thumbs down 0

Respond   Report abuse

Alsters Kelley LLP

Conveyancing/property

1 stars

25/11/18 - Reviewed by Anonymous

Will never use their services, very bad firm they never reply to emails and their staff are very rude. They haven't done any work but they wanted to charge the full fee. AVOID

Was this review helpful?  
Thumbs up 5   Thumbs down 4

Respond   Report abuse

Alsters Kelley LLP

Family

4 stars

23/05/17 - Reviewed by Anonymous

Friendly, caring and efficient service to help me navigate through a difficult time. Would recommend for family matters.

Was this review helpful?  
Thumbs up 2   Thumbs down 4

Respond   Report abuse

Alsters Kelley LLP

Conveyancing/property

1 stars

13/07/16 - Reviewed by Anonymous

Service was very slow, very hard to contact conveyencor. No respect to clients. Emails provided had been lost and duplicate needed to be sent again and again. Very poor service

Was this review helpful?  
Thumbs up 4   Thumbs down 2

Respond   Report abuse

Compiled from data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority website

02/07/16

Source: https://www.sra.org.uk/consumers/solicitor-check/629553.article?Decision=2016-07-01

Outcome: Control of non-qualified staff (section 43 order)
This outcome was reached by SRA decision.
Decision details

The Adjudicator found that Tanya Morgan is or was involved in a legal practice (as defined by section 43 (1A) of the Solicitors Act 1974) but is not a solicitor and has occasioned or been a party to, with or without the connivance of a solicitor, an act or default in relation to a legal practice which involved conduct on her part of such a nature that in the opinion of the Society it would be undesirable for her to be involved in a legal practice in any of the ways set out in the order below.

The Adjudicator decided o make a section 43 order that with effect from the date of the letter or email notifying Tanya Morgan of this decision:

(i) no solicitor shall employ or remunerate her in connection with his/her practice as a solicitor;
(ii) no employee of a solicitor shall employ or remunerate her in connection with the solicitor's practice;
(iii) no recognised body shall employ or remunerate her;
(iv) no manager or employee of a recognised body shall employ or remunerate her in connection with the business of that body;
(v) no recognised body or manager or employee of such a body shall permit her to be a manager of the body; and
(vi) no recognised body or manager or employee of such a body shall permit her to have an interest in the body

except in accordance with a Society permission.

Reasons/basis

Tanya Morgan, a person who is not a solicitor, was employed as a department Administrator by Alsters Kelley LLP in the firm's office at Hamilton House, 20-22 Hamilton Terrace, Leamington Spa, Warwickshire, CV32 4LY between 28 July 2004 and 15 May 2015. During her employment with Alsters Kelley LLP, Ms Morgan was found to have misappropriated property or money due to the estate of a client of the firm.

Ms Morgan's employment with Alsters Kelley LLP was terminated on 15 May 2015.

Was this review helpful?  
Thumbs up 4   Thumbs down 1

Respond   Report abuse

Compiled from data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority website

01/07/16

Source: https://www.sra.org.uk/consumers/solicitor-check/629553.article?Decision=2016-07-01

Outcome: Rebuke
This outcome was reached by SRA decision.
Decision details

Ms Morgan was made subject to an order pursuant to section 43(2) of the Solicitors Act 1974 (as amended). She was also given a written rebuke, directed to pay a financial penalty of ?1,000 and ordered to pay costs of ?600.
Reasons/basis

Tanya Morgan, a person who is not a solicitor, was employed as a department Administrator by Alsters Kelley LLP in the firm's office at Hamilton House, 20-22 Hamilton Terrace, Leamington Spa, Warwickshire, CV32 4LY between 28 July 2004 and 15 May 2015. During her employment with Alsters Kelley LLP, Ms Morgan was found to have misappropriated property or money due to the estate of a client of the firm.

Ms Morgan was summarily dismissed by Alsters Kelley LLP on 15 May 2015 and is currently not involved in a legal practice.

Was this review helpful?  
Thumbs up 2   Thumbs down 2

Respond   Report abuse

Compiled from data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority website

01/07/16

Source: https://www.sra.org.uk/consumers/solicitor-check/629553.article?Decision=2016-07-01

Outcome: Rebuke
Outcome details

This outcome was reached by SRA decision.

Decision details

Ms Morgan was made subject to an order pursuant to section 43(2) of the Solicitors Act 1974 (as amended). She was also given a written rebuke, directed to pay a financial penalty of ?1,000 and ordered to pay costs of ?600.

Reasons/basis

Tanya Morgan, a person who is not a solicitor, was employed as a department Administrator by Alsters Kelley LLP in the firm's office at Hamilton House, 20-22 Hamilton Terrace, Leamington Spa, Warwickshire, CV32 4LY between 28 July 2004 and 15 May 2015. During her employment with Alsters Kelley LLP, Ms Morgan was found to have misappropriated property or money due to the estate of a client of the firm.

Ms Morgan was summarily dismissed by Alsters Kelley LLP on 15 May 2015 and is currently not involved in a legal practice.

Was this review helpful?  
Thumbs up 1   Thumbs down 1

Respond   Report abuse

Compiled from data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority website

01/07/16

Source: https://www.sra.org.uk/consumers/solicitor-check/629553.article?Decision=2016-07-01

Outcome: Control of non-qualified staff (section 43 order)
Outcome details

This outcome was reached by SRA decision.

Decision details



The Adjudicator found that Tanya Morgan is or was involved in a legal practice (as defined by section 43 (1A) of the Solicitors Act 1974) but is not a solicitor and has occasioned or been a party to, with or without the connivance of a solicitor, an act or default in relation to a legal practice which involved conduct on her part of such a nature that in the opinion of the Society it would be undesirable for her to be involved in a legal practice in any of the ways set out in the order below.

The Adjudicator decided o make a section 43 order that with effect from the date of the letter or email notifying Tanya Morgan of this decision:



(i) no solicitor shall employ or remunerate her in connection with his/her practice as a solicitor;

(ii) no employee of a solicitor shall employ or remunerate her in connection with the solicitor's practice;

(iii) no recognised body shall employ or remunerate her;

(iv) no manager or employee of a recognised body shall employ or remunerate her in connection with the business of that body;

(v) no recognised body or manager or employee of such a body shall permit her to be a manager of the body; and

(vi) no recognised body or manager or employee of such a body shall permit her to have an interest in the body



except in accordance with a Society permission.



Reasons/basis

Tanya Morgan, a person who is not a solicitor, was employed as a department Administrator by Alsters Kelley LLP in the firm's office at Hamilton House, 20-22 Hamilton Terrace, Leamington Spa, Warwickshire, CV32 4LY between 28 July 2004 and 15 May 2015. During her employment with Alsters Kelley LLP, Ms Morgan was found to have misappropriated property or money due to the estate of a client of the firm.

Ms Morgan's employment with Alsters Kelley LLP was terminated on 15 May 2015.

Was this review helpful?  
Thumbs up 0   Thumbs down 1

Respond   Report abuse

Alsters Kelley LLP

Medical negligence

1 stars

25/11/15 - Reviewed by Marco

The service with the above legal firm has been a nightmare; it cannot be define even a service.
I had a strong case in medical negligence and the firm obtained a legal aid as it was applied before the 01 April 2013 date in which thanks to God the Legal Aid has been removed. The firm did not do anything to win the case but rather played in favour of the NHS (defendant). After 3 years and after have been exhausted the Legal Aid funds completely I was informed with a simple e-mail that my case suddenly did not have any chance of success.

My advice is avoid this legal firm......

Was this review helpful?  
Thumbs up 2   Thumbs down 2

Respond   Report abuse

Alsters Kelley LLP

Family

1 stars

15/12/08 - Reviewed by Anonymous

Have complaints made against them at www.parents4protest.co.uk

Was this review helpful?  
Thumbs up 0   Thumbs down 3

Respond   Report abuse

Subscribe to updates

Complete the form below to be notified of new reviews or responses added for this solicitor.


terms of use

Enter this code » Verify

Related links

About us
Legal info
For Solicitors
FAQ
21521 solicitor reviews

3,532,253 page views