Ask Legal solicitors reviews & information

<p class='center'><strong>2 reviews/comments</strong></p><div id='chart'></div><p class='center'><a href='#solicitorreviews' title='View reviews/comments for this solicitor'>View all reviews/comments</a></p><p>1 reviews removed</p>
(2 reviews/comments)

Reviews removed: 1   Why was a review removed?

Rate Ask Legal solicitors


2 Finney Lane, Heald Green, Cheadle Cheshire
Cheadle, Cheshire, SK8 3DQ

Areas of law reviewed: Personal injury law

Reviews

Rate Ask Legal solicitor
Ask Legal solicitors

16/01/14 - Rating by Anonymous

Area of law reviewed: Personal injury

5 star rating

Respond
Report abuse

Great service, and were able to handle the complex litigation involved in my claim, which other firms shied away from

18/06/13 - Compiled from data from the Solicitors Regulation Authority website

Area of law reviewed: General Legal advice

Respond
Report abuse

Decision - control of practice

Outcome: PC/registration free of conditions

Outcome date: 6 July 2012

Published date: 8 August 2012

Firm details

Firm or organisation at date of publication

Name: Ask Legal Solicitors

Address(es):
2 Finney Lane, Heald Green, Cheadle Cheshire SK8 3DQ,

Firm ID: 559719

Firm or organisation at time of matters giving rise to outcome

Name: Rain Gaskell Solicitors

Address(es):
78a Dickenson Road, Manchester Lancashire M14 5HF

Firm ID: 472304

Outcome details

This outcome was reached by SRA decision.

Reasons/basis

Mr Rulal was subject to Regulation 3.1(a)[i], (g) and (n) of the SRA Practising Regulations 2011, as detailed above, as a consequence of regulatory matters.

Accordingly, the Authorised Officer was required to consider whether to impose any practising certificate conditions in accordance with Regulation 7 of the SRA Practising Regulations 2011 which sets out the purposes for which conditions may, in the public interest, be imposed on a solicitor's practising certificate.

The Authorised Officer also had consideration to the regulatory objectives set out in Section 1 and Section 28 of the Legal Services Act 2007 along with the tests set out in the matters of A Odunlami [2008] EWCA Civ 1598 and F Razeen [2008] EWCA Civ 1220.

The Authorised Officer was also satisfied that it would not be necessary, reasonable or proportionate in the interests of protection of the public to impose any practising certificate condition at this time. The Authorised Officer was also satisfied that none of the purposes specified in Regulation 7 of the SRA Practising Regulations 2011 make it necessary in the interests of the public to impose any practising certificate condition. Accordingly, the Authorised Officer authorised the issue of an unconditional practising certificate.


Did these reviews/comments match your experience? Leave a review


Map of Ask Legal solicitors, Cheadle

Subscribe to updates

Notify me of new reviews or responses added for this solicitor:

Email address:

I agree with the solicitor.info terms of use

Enter this code » Verify

Into the verify box »

Related links